Please read the short essay, or just click the answers to these simple questions. You may need to *enable popups.
Please click on whatever answer seems best1. What would you expect to see in a Socialist United States?
* Tremendous uniformity, as everybody would be the same
* Major productive facilities would be under democratic control
* Women would no longer be able to choose their mates
* Harsh dictatorship
* All of the above
2. What did Marx and Engels contribute to the struggle for socialism?
* They showed how wonderful it would be
* They cautioned that it might not be so wonderful
* They took a serious approach to making socialism a reality
* They praised all of the previous writings about socialism
* All of the above
3. What is the most likely reason for the disappearance of the socialist experiments
in Texas?
* Socialists weren't really very capable
* Socialism looks good on paper, but it doesn't work in reality
* They didn't have a serious analysis of what they were up against
* They should have taken a more gradual approach
4. Which might be the best example of practical socialism?
* Neighbors get together on a gardening project
* Neighbors declare a month-long "love in" where everyone strives to come together
* Workers overcome capitalist control of factories and farms
* Farmers decide to share their equipment during harvest time
|
Socialism: What It Is and Isn't |
Karl Marx did not invent socialism. Elements of the idea have appeared here and there in human history, including in the U.S. during the period of youth upsurge in the 1960s and 1970s. Before Marx became famous, a number of philosophers and novelists had written about socialism. One famous version was named "Utopia."
There were many attempts to put socialist ideas into effect. During the period 1840-1860, several "socialist" communities were begun in the United States, where land was relatively cheap. Texas had a number of such experiments. History books usually dismiss them as having failed due to their own incompetence, but it is notable that the efforts in Texas and other Southern states came to an end during the war-drive years around 1860. The socialists opposed slavery.
Socialist communities were characterized by the sharing of work and the fruits of work. During the 1970s in the United States, some "counter-culturalists" hoped that their "own" community-based institutions such as neighborhood gardens, clothing exchanges, free schools, and food co-ops would undermine and replace the powerful institutions of the capitalist world. In that period, Ivan Illich posited an "autotellic" society, and psychologist B.F. Skinner's utopian books, "Walden Two" and "Beyond Freedom & Dignity" found great popularity.
A lot of intellectuals, most notably Noam Chomsky, pretend to be socialists in order to establish a pulpit to preach against those who are actually struggling for a better world. They get published a lot more than honest intellectuals like Michael Parenti. Parenti has an extensive explanation of such "left anti-communists." Check it out if you have time.
In 2011, some proponents of the "Occupy Wall Street" movement thought that they could establish enduring utopian communities within capitalist cities, but history argues against the likelihood. The great value of the occupation movement lay not in utopian communities but in the tremendous inspiration they gave to the rest of the population.
Opponents of socialism, who also go back through the ages, say it can't work. Additionally, they say that socialism is unfair or undemocratic. It is neither, but you can see why a capitalist would say that.
Karl Marx and Frederick Engels did not waste a lot of words trying to describe the heavenly benefits of a future socialist society. They published a list of some likely features that included the idea that the main factories and instruments of production would be owned and run democratically by the people.
They did not say, as their detractors constantly accuse them, that everybody had to give up their private property, families, and individual differences.
Where Marx and Engels differ from the utopians before and after them is that they put forward a viable plan for changing from the capitalism we have now to a democratic socialism of the future. Instead of "pie in the sky," they carefully analyzed what was going on and what had happened before. They assessed the motion of social changes and guided the progressive movement toward a much better society. They wrote, "In place of the old bourgeois [capitalist] society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all."
Socialists have never altered their goals. Individual efforts in various countries have strived mightily for socialism. But they always had the world-powerful capitalist system undermining, boycotting, spying, attacking, and maligning them. The Paris Commune, usually considered the first real workers' government, lasted a few weeks before capitalist armies drowned it in blood. Even a few weeks was considered miraculous. Since then, other countries and confederations of countries have held out against capitalism for decades. When they fall short of someone's socialist ideal, capitalists always say that the socialist states "failed" because the idea can't work. They don't mention their own qualitative role in making certain that individual socialist experiments fall short.
The capitalists laughed at the early socialists and dismissed them. They aren't laughing at scientific Marxism, and they can never dismiss it.
**
Please use the form below to provide feedback, or just send me an e-mail