1a. Plekhanov's less-than-100% understanding of Marxism is revealed in this book by his asserting that the oriental method of production was part of a historical succession. Please read the essay or just pick another answer.

1b. CORRECT. Lenin greatly appreciated the intellectual contribution of Plekhanov. Skip to the next question

Actually, he didn't. Please read the essay or just pick another answer.

There were all kinds of devoted revolutionaries before and after Marx and Engels put it on a scientific footing. Their methods be wrong, but their aims and their courage aren't necessarily their problem. Please read the essay or just pick another answer.

They opposed Tsarism, heart and soul. Please read the essay or just pick another answer.

CORRECT! In their defense, they were mainly popular before they had a chance to study Marxism in Russian. Skip to the next question

They had no scientific approach, but they had a lot of exuberance for their work. Please read the essay or just pick another answer.

The book doesn't dwell on Plekhanov's attitude toward slavery. Please read the essay or just pick another answer.

CORRECT! He was backing up Engels and the whole idea of historical materialism. Skip to the next question

Actually, most changes are gradual. Please read the essay or just pick another answer.

Ah, if all changes were gradual, then we'd be able to sharpen our ability to predict. But they aren't. Please read the essay or just pick another answer.

RIGHT! When history makes a big qualitative jump, such as a change in which class rules, it's pretty astounding. Thanks for doing this little module. You'll help me improve the school if you'll use the feedback option

I'm just messing with you. I have no idea about his impatience one way or the other, and why would we care? Please read the essay or just pick another answer.